Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Dickson S(dot) Guedes" <listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
Date: 2011-10-19 14:58:09
Message-ID: CA+U5nML68fc+uCM=mois8xngoKZUwtOJVbvM6iFY3vWVS0qnVw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I don't really see any reason to break the monitoring view just
>> because we did some internal refactoring.  I'd rather have backward
>> compatibility.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> The patch doesn't change any document, but at least the description
> of pg_stat_bgwriter seems to need to be changed.

Thanks for the review.

Will follow up on suggestions.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2011-10-19 15:30:57 Re: new compiler warnings
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2011-10-19 14:41:32 Re: loss of transactions in streaming replication