Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Dickson S(dot) Guedes" <listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
Date: 2011-11-01 16:14:06
Message-ID: CA+U5nMJBuq+az3CkX=1sSZ8kRW05=dFBcLF-LtmFybn0LcN5og@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I don't really see any reason to break the monitoring view just
>>> because we did some internal refactoring.  I'd rather have backward
>>> compatibility.
>>
>> Fair enough.
>>
>> The patch doesn't change any document, but at least the description
>> of pg_stat_bgwriter seems to need to be changed.
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> Will follow up on suggestions.

I'll add this in as a separate item after commit.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-11-01 16:24:20 Re: Thoughts on "SELECT * EXCLUDING (...) FROM ..."?
Previous Message Alcione Benacchio 2011-11-01 16:12:52 OK