From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Dickson S(dot) Guedes" <listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer |
Date: | 2011-11-01 16:14:06 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMJBuq+az3CkX=1sSZ8kRW05=dFBcLF-LtmFybn0LcN5og@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I don't really see any reason to break the monitoring view just
>>> because we did some internal refactoring. I'd rather have backward
>>> compatibility.
>>
>> Fair enough.
>>
>> The patch doesn't change any document, but at least the description
>> of pg_stat_bgwriter seems to need to be changed.
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> Will follow up on suggestions.
I'll add this in as a separate item after commit.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-11-01 16:24:20 | Re: Thoughts on "SELECT * EXCLUDING (...) FROM ..."? |
Previous Message | Alcione Benacchio | 2011-11-01 16:12:52 | OK |