Re: loss of transactions in streaming replication

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: loss of transactions in streaming replication
Date: 2011-10-19 14:41:32
Message-ID: CAHGQGwF70UQ2p3Sx-_ARt-aR5y1JmHycnRWBeoGw5xoURaOJhw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The original behavior, in 9.0, is that all outstanding WAL are
>> replicated to the standby when the master shuts down normally.
>> But ISTM the behavior was changed unexpectedly in 9.1. So
>> I think that it should be back-patched to 9.1 to revert the behavior
>> to the original.
>
> Which commit broke this?

d3d414696f39e2b57072fab3dd4fa11e465be4ed
b186523fd97ce02ffbb7e21d5385a047deeef4f6

The former introduced problematic libpqrcv_send() (which was my mistake...),
and the latter is the first user of it.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-10-19 14:58:09 Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-10-19 14:40:25 Re: [v9.2] Object access hooks with arguments support (v1)