Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Dickson S(dot) Guedes" <listas(at)guedesoft(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
Date: 2011-10-19 14:29:12
Message-ID: CAHGQGwH1ot128dZwOd_yhRxNJMf2ME8qEWP1ftR7SkSyOkaCdg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't really see any reason to break the monitoring view just
> because we did some internal refactoring.  I'd rather have backward
> compatibility.

Fair enough.

The patch doesn't change any document, but at least the description
of pg_stat_bgwriter seems to need to be changed.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-10-19 14:40:25 Re: [v9.2] Object access hooks with arguments support (v1)
Previous Message Kerem Kat 2011-10-19 13:01:09 (PATCH) Adding CORRESPONDING to Set Operations