Re: Basic JSON support

From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Basic JSON support
Date: 2010-09-16 01:53:43
Message-ID: AANLkTinJ36afkbajNjUcPLfeTDjMiuvnWn5aWV5WBGXS@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Did you extract this from his work, or is this completely independent?
>  I'm a bit disinclined to say we should just toss overboard all the
> work that's already been done.  Why did you write a new patch?

I read his patch and am inspired by the work, but the code is almost
rewritten. As my previous comment,
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-08/msg01773.php
I think it's not a good idea to develop JSON datatype based on the
complex node links. The point of my patch is to simplify it.

I'd like to encourage use of the simplified structure to implement
his other works, including JSONPath.

--
Itagaki Takahiro

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-09-16 02:05:00 Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2010-09-16 01:31:15 Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL