From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Basic JSON support |
Date: | 2010-09-16 00:44:25 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimpx_A+6RnWDEV6znSxwZjL0Rx3fQ+9Rcz2V+0z@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Itagaki Takahiro
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:45 AM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
>>> We have "JSON datatype (WIP) 01" item:
>>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=351
>>> but it seems too complex for me to apply all of the feature
>>> at once, especially JSON-Path support. So, I'd like to submit
>>> only basic and minimal JSON datatype support at first.
>>
>> So should this be added to the commitfest, or replace this one?
>
> I added my patch, but the previous one will be returned with feedback
> if the author doesn't have a new version adjusted to existing comments.
Did you extract this from his work, or is this completely independent?
I'm a bit disinclined to say we should just toss overboard all the
work that's already been done. Why did you write a new patch?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2010-09-16 00:53:27 | Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-16 00:43:29 | Re: autonomous transactions (was Re: TODO note) |