Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL

From: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL
Date: 2010-09-16 01:31:15
Message-ID: 4C917363.6060304@catalyst.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16/09/10 13:22, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hitoshi Harada<umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
>> 2010/9/16 Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>
>>> Oh, key-value store, I bet. Yeah, that would be cool.
>>>
>
>> That's it. Like Redis, Tokyo Cabinet, or something.
>>
> What exactly do those get you that an ordinary index, or at worst an
> index-organized table, doesn't get you?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

It is pretty rare to see key value stores vs relational engines
discussed without a descent into total foolishiness, but this Wikipedia
page looks like a reasonable summary:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2010-09-16 01:53:43 Re: Basic JSON support
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-16 01:22:02 Re: patch: SQL/MED(FDW) DDL