| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql |
| Date: | 2009-01-08 17:44:59 |
| Message-ID: | 200901081744.n08Hixn01494@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:08:06 -0500 (EST)
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Right, so Tom says it isn't 100% ReST:
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg01310.php
>
> Right but did you see the followup?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg01319.php
Yes, I did, and now I see why you said there might be only a few broken
cases. But I did not see any documentation in the standard saying that
was OK:
http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/rst/quickref.html#escaping
so it might be that your ReST interpreter is broken.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-08 17:46:34 | Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql |
| Previous Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2009-01-08 17:30:41 | Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql |