Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Date: 2009-01-08 17:46:34
Message-ID: 18048.1231436794@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> writes:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:08:06 -0500 (EST)
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Right, so Tom says it isn't 100% ReST:
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg01310.php

> Right but did you see the followup?
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg01319.php

And the followup to that?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-01-08 17:50:57 Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-01-08 17:44:59 Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql