Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql

From: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Date: 2009-01-08 17:30:41
Message-ID: 20090108123041.7ae6518e.darcy@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:08:06 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Right, so Tom says it isn't 100% ReST:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg01310.php

Right but did you see the followup?

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg01319.php

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-01-08 17:44:59 Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-01-08 17:24:24 Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql