| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Rural Hunter <ruralhunter(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed |
| Date: | 2012-09-24 15:22:22 |
| Message-ID: | 50607AAE.70400@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
On 9/24/12 11:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> Well, if you run that query on template0 in the old and new cluster, you
>> will see something different in the two of them. Could you have used
>> default in one and a non-dash in the other. Did we change the way we
>> canonicalize the locale between 9.1 and 9.2?
>
> IIRC, we didn't try to canonicalize locale names at all before 9.2.
> That initdb code you're quoting is of fairly recent vintage.
initdb has changed POSIX to C with glibc at least since 8.3. The code
you're quoting is just a refactoring, AFAICT.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-09-24 15:24:04 | Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-09-24 15:07:33 | Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-09-24 15:24:04 | Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-09-24 15:16:46 | Re: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY is not really concurrency safe & leaves around undroppable indexes |