Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Rural Hunter <ruralhunter(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Date: 2012-09-24 15:04:32
Message-ID: 15359.1348499072@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Well, if you run that query on template0 in the old and new cluster, you
> will see something different in the two of them. Could you have used
> default in one and a non-dash in the other. Did we change the way we
> canonicalize the locale between 9.1 and 9.2?

IIRC, we didn't try to canonicalize locale names at all before 9.2.
That initdb code you're quoting is of fairly recent vintage.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-09-24 15:07:33 Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-09-24 14:57:31 Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-09-24 15:07:33 Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2012-09-24 15:00:08 Re: pg_reorg in core?