Re: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY is not really concurrency safe & leaves around undroppable indexes

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY is not really concurrency safe & leaves around undroppable indexes
Date: 2012-09-24 15:16:46
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLx9TfLYktfQNQovBtpeEYKP9NXWWdk6p1Yq=PsN5k-jw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24 September 2012 06:27, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> Problem 1: concurrency:

> Problem 2: undroppable indexes:

Thanks for posting. I'll think some more before replying.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-09-24 15:22:22 Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-09-24 15:15:32 Re: pg_reorg in core?