| From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "rod(at)iol(dot)ie" <rod(at)iol(dot)ie>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Native DB replication for PG |
| Date: | 2010-05-03 17:53:11 |
| Message-ID: | i2ob42b73151005031053pdc6ced3n363c1b4c7a8c56ac@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Gauthier, Dave <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com> wrote:
> So, back to the base note, as far as native replication support, I should wait for v9 whic'll probably be out by the end of the summer?
for 'native' replication waiting for 9.0 is your only option, because
all of the other replication options available today are 3rd party
unless you count warm standby.
the various 3rd party replication solutions have pros and cons.
speaking generally, they are more complex to set up and administer
than hs/sr but also more flexible.
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-03 17:59:12 | Re: pg9 beta1, make check fails |
| Previous Message | Andy Colson | 2010-05-03 17:44:20 | pg9 beta1, make check fails |