| From: | Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: insert performance for win32 |
| Date: | 2005-11-03 20:25:42 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0511031523440.15487@josh.db |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Both win32 send/recv have pgwin32_poll_signals() in them.
> > This is glorified WaitForSingleObjectEx on global
> > pgwin32_signal_event. This is probably part of the problem.
> > Can we work some of the same magic you put into check
> > interrupts macro?
> >
>
> Uh, we already do that, don't we?
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/port/win32/
> socket.c?rev=1.10
> has:
>
Yeah, we did this. I am thinking of just use simple mechanism of the win32
sockets, which could not pick up signals, but I would like to see if there
is any difference -- do you think there is any point to try this?
Regards,
Qingqing
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-11-03 20:30:30 | Re: insert performance for win32 |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2005-11-03 19:11:43 | Re: Sorted union |