Re: Sorted union

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, <slamb(at)slamb(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Sorted union
Date: 2005-11-03 19:11:43
Message-ID: 436A0C8F0200002500000459@gwmta.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Just as an FYI, if you want to reassure yourself that the ORDER BY
is being applied as intended, you could do the following:

(
select 1 as hint, start_time as when [...]
union all
select 2 as hint, end_time as when [...]
) order by seq, when

This is ANSI/ISO standard, and works in PostgreSQL (based on
a quick test).

>>> "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> >>>

hmm, try pushing the union into a subquery...this is better style
because it's kind of ambiguous if the ordering will apply before/after
the union.

select q.when from
(
select 1 as hint, start_time as when [...]
union all
select 2 as hint, end_time as when [...]
) q order by q.seq, when

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Qingqing Zhou 2005-11-03 20:25:42 Re: insert performance for win32
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-11-03 19:04:01 Re: insert performance for win32