Re: insert performance for win32

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
Cc: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: insert performance for win32
Date: 2005-11-03 20:30:30
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E7EF@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> > > Both win32 send/recv have pgwin32_poll_signals() in them.
> > > This is glorified WaitForSingleObjectEx on global
> > > pgwin32_signal_event. This is probably part of the problem.
> > > Can we work some of the same magic you put into check interrupts
> > > macro?
> > >
> >
> > Uh, we already do that, don't we?
> >
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/port/win3
> > 2/
> > socket.c?rev=1.10
> > has:
> >
>
> Yeah, we did this. I am thinking of just use simple mechanism
> of the win32 sockets, which could not pick up signals, but I
> would like to see if there is any difference -- do you think
> there is any point to try this?

Sorry, I don't follow you here - what do you mean to do? Remove the
event completely so we can't wait on it?

//Magnus

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Qingqing Zhou 2005-11-03 20:34:55 Re: insert performance for win32
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2005-11-03 20:25:42 Re: insert performance for win32