Re: new json funcs

For consistency with the existing json functions (json_each,
json_each_text, etc.) it might be better to add separate
json_to_record_text and json_to_recordset_text functions in place of the
nested_as_text parameter to json_to_record and json_to_recordset.

On 24 January 2014 10:26, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

>
> On 01/22/2014 12:49 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>>
>> On 01/21/2014 06:21 PM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> On 1/18/14, 10:05 PM, I wrote:
>>>
>>>> But I'll continue with my review now that this has been sorted out.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry about the delay.
>>>
>>> I think the API for the new functions looks good. They are all welcome
>>> additions to the JSON family.
>>>
>>> The implementation side looks reasonable to me. I'm not sure there's
>>> need to duplicate so much code, though. E.g. json_to_recordset is almost
>>> identical to json_populate_recordset, and json_to_record has a bit of the
>>> same disease.
>>>
>>> Finally, (as I'm sure you know already), docs are still missing. Marking
>>> the patch Waiting on Author for the time being.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> New patch attached. Main change is I changed json_populate_record/json_to_record
>> to call a common worker function, and likewise with
>> json_populate_recordset/json_to_recordset.
>>
>> We're still finalizing the docs - should be ready in the next day or so.
>>
>
>
> OK, here's the patch, this time with docs, thanks to Merlin Moncure and
> Josh Berkus for help with that.
>
> I want to do some more wordsmithing around json_to_record{set} and
> json_populate_record{set}, but I think this is close to being committable
> as is.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
>