Re: new json funcs

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Laurence Rowe <l(at)lrowe(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new json funcs
Date: 2014-01-24 20:59:35
Message-ID: 52E2D437.6030100@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 01/24/2014 03:40 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
> For consistency with the existing json functions (json_each,
> json_each_text, etc.) it might be better to add separate
> json_to_record_text and json_to_recordset_text functions in place of
> the nested_as_text parameter to json_to_record and json_to_recordset.
>
>

It wouldn't be consistent with json_populate_record() and
json_populate_recordset(), the two closest relatives, however.

And yes, I appreciate that we have not been 100% consistent. Community
design can be a bit messy that way.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2014-01-24 21:26:42 Re: new json funcs
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-01-24 20:47:47 Re: Standalone synchronous master