On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> We rarely get into specific numers like this. It says "higher limit(s)" and
> hopefully that is enough. If you want to create a documentation 'id' I
> can like to that for the "higher limits" text.
You don't have to mention a number. Just the fact that there is now
*no* limit on stored query text length, which is the point. It's also
nice that the per-entry shared memory overhead is much lower, which as
I said I think warrants a mention in passing.
--
Peter Geoghegan