From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.4 release notes |
Date: | 2014-05-06 00:13:00 |
Message-ID: | 20140506001300.GP29541@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 04:20:26PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > We rarely get into specific numers like this. It says "higher limit(s)" and
> > hopefully that is enough. If you want to create a documentation 'id' I
> > can like to that for the "higher limits" text.
>
> You don't have to mention a number. Just the fact that there is now
> *no* limit on stored query text length, which is the point. It's also
> nice that the per-entry shared memory overhead is much lower, which as
> I said I think warrants a mention in passing.
OK, I understand now. I also split the item into two separate ones so I
could highlight things. Please see the new ouput --- I ended up
creating a pg_stat_statements section because there are now three items:
http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-4.html
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-05-06 00:22:59 | Re: 9.4 release notes |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2014-05-06 00:00:36 | Re: 9.4 release notes |