Re: docs: additional subsection for page-level locks in explicit-locking section

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: docs: additional subsection for page-level locks in explicit-locking section
Date: 2014-07-03 13:14:06
Message-ID: CAHGQGwFbfPZA5sqoj3gymbO2wCBw0gLZmC+ZzqgWi1V3zn9W2g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While reading through the Explicit Locking section of the manual today,
> I felt the last paragraph of section 13.3.2. (Row-level Locks) might
> merit its own subsection. It talks about page-level locks as distinct
> from table- and row-level locks. Then again, it is just one paragraph,
> so maybe this was deliberate and/or rejected before (though I couldn't
> find prior discussion off-hand). Proposed patch attached.

This seems to make sense. Barring objection, I will commit this only in HEAD.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Atri Sharma 2014-07-03 13:42:15 Re: bad estimation together with large work_mem generates terrible slow hash joins
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2014-07-03 13:03:10 Re: Should extension--unpackaged-$ver.sql's \echo use FROM unpackaged; ?