Re: pg_shmem_allocations view

From: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_shmem_allocations view
Date: 2014-08-15 08:12:11
Message-ID: CABRT9RBUOP01chRWxmNMznNUiQGDyGxfxhkX9zw5WxZJyQEZxw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Ok. A new version of the patches implementing that are
> attached. Including a couple of small fixups and docs. The latter aren't
> extensive, but that doesn't seem to be warranted anyway.

Is it really actually useful to expose the segment off(set) to users?
Seems to me like unnecessary internal details leaking out.

Regards,
Marti

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2014-08-15 08:17:21 Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots
Previous Message furuyao 2014-08-15 07:56:53 Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots