| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_shmem_allocations view |
| Date: | 2014-08-15 08:20:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20140815082035.GB28805@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-08-15 11:12:11 +0300, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Ok. A new version of the patches implementing that are
> > attached. Including a couple of small fixups and docs. The latter aren't
> > extensive, but that doesn't seem to be warranted anyway.
>
> Is it really actually useful to expose the segment off(set) to users?
> Seems to me like unnecessary internal details leaking out.
Yes. This is clearly developer oriented and I'd more than once wished I
could see where some stray pointer is pointing to... That's not really
possible without something like this.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-08-15 08:25:35 | Re: pg_shmem_allocations view |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-08-15 08:17:21 | Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots |