Re: Regarding BGworkers

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Regarding BGworkers
Date: 2013-08-14 12:04:06
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTZzoc6qi=ziW=sFyj5mpAd_CYu+hqVAKTcZ0gVCq7Dyw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think Alvaro's suggestion is better. It's shorter, and makes clear
> that at most one will be started.
OK cool. Here are patches for 9.3 and master respecting those comments.

Regards,
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
20130814_bgworker_refactor_93_v2.patch application/octet-stream 3.4 KB
20130814_bgworker_refactor_master_v2.patch application/octet-stream 15.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2013-08-14 12:40:26 Re: timeline signedness
Previous Message Rushabh Lathia 2013-08-14 09:56:05 insert throw error when year field len > 4 for timestamptz datatype