Re: Regarding BGworkers

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Regarding BGworkers
Date: 2013-08-16 19:32:22
Message-ID: CA+TgmoavJVc4K9xpMNkKU+g0rY6H2vssBo5E=VxfTaRihr=1qA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think Alvaro's suggestion is better. It's shorter, and makes clear
>> that at most one will be started.
> OK cool. Here are patches for 9.3 and master respecting those comments.

Thanks, committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-08-16 19:35:21 Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)
Previous Message Greg Stark 2013-08-16 18:57:47 Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)