| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Inoue, Hiroshi" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
| Date: | 2014-02-11 15:04:29 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1L_d6FOzhMawFLGq2CWYM_VUN-OjqGXJMdURcdEgD=xUQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 02/11/2014 01:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If there are no objections, I'll push this patch into HEAD tomorrow,
>> along with the upthread patches from Craig Ringer and Marco Atzeri.
>> We might as well see if this stuff is going to work ...
>
> I'd love to test my patch properly before pushing it, but my dev machine
> is going to need a total teardown and rebuild,
I can do the test of your patch/idea, please confirm if below steps are
sufficient:
a. Change manually postgres.def file and add DATA for MainLWLockArray.
(Will it be sufficient to change manually or should I apply your patch)
b. Rebuild pg_buffercache module
c. Test pg_buffercache if it can access the variable.
d. If above works, then run 'check'.
If I understand correctly your patch is intended to resolve PGDLLIMPORT
problem, right?
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-02-11 15:56:07 | Re: [PERFORM] encouraging index-only scans |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-02-11 14:15:45 | Re: Patch: show xid and xmin in pg_stat_activity and pg_stat_replication |