Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Inoue, Hiroshi" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Date: 2014-02-11 05:31:39
Message-ID: 52F9B5BB.6090105@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/11/2014 01:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> If there are no objections, I'll push this patch into HEAD tomorrow,
> along with the upthread patches from Craig Ringer and Marco Atzeri.
> We might as well see if this stuff is going to work ...

I'd love to test my patch properly before pushing it, but my dev machine
is going to need a total teardown and rebuild, and I'm currently focused
on polishing off urgent open work.

So let's see what the buildfarm makes of it, I guess.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2014-02-11 08:36:10 Re: Row-security on updatable s.b. views
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-02-11 05:28:32 Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT