Re: Should extension--unpackaged-$ver.sql's \echo use FROM unpackaged; ?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should extension--unpackaged-$ver.sql's \echo use FROM unpackaged; ?
Date: 2014-07-06 20:58:33
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYjAEE+NtBQobrW3aruTxB7ONmdM+HSEdYKmO69iTJksw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Fujii noticed that I'd used
>> \echo Use "CREATE EXTENSION pg_buffercache" to load this file. \quit
>> in an extension upgrade script. That's obviously wrong, because it
>> should say ALTER EXTENSION. The reason it's that way is that I copied
>> the line from the unpackaged--1.0.sql file.
>> I noticed all unpackaged--$version transition files miss the "FROM
>> unpackaged" in that echo.
>> I guess that's just a oversight which we should correct?
>
> Maybe for user-friendness. But I think that's not so important fix enough
> to backpatch.

Seems like a clear mistake to me. +1 for fixing it and back-patching.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2014-07-06 23:12:42 Re: wrapping in extended mode doesn't work well with default pager
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2014-07-06 19:56:00 Re: Performance regression: 9.2+ vs. ScalarArrayOpExpr vs. ORDER BY