Re: Should extension--unpackaged-$ver.sql's \echo use FROM unpackaged;?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should extension--unpackaged-$ver.sql's \echo use FROM unpackaged;?
Date: 2014-08-21 23:11:35
Message-ID: 20140821231135.GF17406@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-07-06 16:58:33 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Fujii noticed that I'd used
> >> \echo Use "CREATE EXTENSION pg_buffercache" to load this file. \quit
> >> in an extension upgrade script. That's obviously wrong, because it
> >> should say ALTER EXTENSION. The reason it's that way is that I copied
> >> the line from the unpackaged--1.0.sql file.
> >> I noticed all unpackaged--$version transition files miss the "FROM
> >> unpackaged" in that echo.
> >> I guess that's just a oversight which we should correct?
> >
> > Maybe for user-friendness. But I think that's not so important fix enough
> > to backpatch.
>
> Seems like a clear mistake to me. +1 for fixing it and back-patching.

I think so as well - and I now have a patch for it. Fujii, do you mind
if I backpatch 6f9e39bc9993c1 to 9.1, 9.2 and 9.3 for you?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2014-08-21 23:14:24 Re: ALTER TABLESPACE MOVE command tag tweak
Previous Message David Fetter 2014-08-21 23:11:02 Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1