Re: Progress indication prototype

From: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Progress indication prototype
Date: 2010-08-17 17:23:31
Message-ID: AANLkTimD9rZPEAhaVNp62u_qyZF8cdYRpdwYOznAJRHH@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:31, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Peter Eisentraut (peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net) wrote:
>> Other comments?
>
> Will we be able to use it for psql while keeping just one database
> connection?  I assume the answer is 'no', but it sure would be nice..

I think thats something that could be worked out in libpq after this
patch. Although I'd bump your nice to an awesome.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-08-17 17:24:41 Re: Todays git migration results
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-08-17 17:23:05 Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown