Re: Todays git migration results

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Todays git migration results
Date: 2010-08-17 17:24:41
Message-ID: 201008171724.o7HHOf400202@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 18:48, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> OK, try this. ?It takes about 14 seconds on my machine on my copy of
> >> Magnus's test repository. ?Output looks like this:
> >
> > 14 seconds! ?That sound much too slow :-)
>
> /me is very sorry master. Please beat your unworthy servant only
> lightly... or alternatively, buy me a faster machine.
>
> It should get a bit faster if we reduce the number of branches it
> examines, which I assume is something we can do once we desupport 7.4
> and 8.0. We could also add a --since argument which would doubtless
> speed things up a lot, by truncating the history to, say, the last N

Yes, I will definately need a --since argument like cvs log -d which
restricts by date. I usually find the data of the previous release and
use that to pull cvs logs to create the release notes.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-08-17 17:25:32 Re: Todays git migration results
Previous Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-08-17 17:23:31 Re: Progress indication prototype