Re: poor wording on SSPI error message

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: poor wording on SSPI error message
Date: 2009-03-06 22:03:35
Message-ID: 49B19DB7.1020909@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This message
>
> r = (_QuerySecurityContextToken) (sspictx, &token);
> if (r != SEC_E_OK)
> {
> FreeLibrary(secur32);
> pg_SSPI_error(ERROR,
> gettext_noop("could not get security token from context"), r);
> }
>
> looks poorly worded. What "context" is it talking about? Can we be a
> bit more explicit? Any other thoughts on how to improve it?

Hmm. that should probalby read "could not get token from security
context", because that's what it's trying to do. But maybe you meant
something different from that as well?

/Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-03-06 22:13:43 Re: Out parameters handling
Previous Message Lawrence, Ramon 2009-03-06 22:00:03 Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-BatchHash Join for Skewed Data Sets