| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.5 CF1 |
| Date: | 2014-06-17 16:54:14 |
| Message-ID: | 4712.1403024054@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> P.S. If you tag your reviews with [REVIEW] in the Subject, it'll be
>>> easier to keep track of them.
>> I and, I believe, various other people hate that style, because at
>> least in Gmail, it breaks the threading. It is much easier to find
>> things if they are all posted on one thread.
> Yes, please don't do that. A simple, normal reply to the message that
> submits the patch is much better from my point of view as a subsequent
> reviewer and committer.
Worth noting also is that Magnus is working on a new version of the
commitfest app that will be able to automatically keep track of threads
about patches --- so long as they *are* threads according to our mailing
list archives. I'm not sure if the archives recognize replies with a
changed Subject: as being the same thread or not.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-06-17 16:55:14 | Re: 9.5 CF1 |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-06-17 16:50:11 | Re: Set new system identifier using pg_resetxlog |