| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Royce Ausburn <royce(dot)ml(at)inomial(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters |
| Date: | 2011-10-06 17:37:01 |
| Message-ID: | 4386.1317922621@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Oct 6, 2011, at 9:46 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> +1. However, if that's the route we're traveling down, I think we had
>>> better go ahead and remove the one remaining => operator from hstore
>>> in 9.2:
>> Fair enough.
> Would it then be added as an alias for := for named function parameters? Or would that come still later?
Once we do that, it will be impossible not merely deprecated to use =>
as an operator name. I think that has to wait at least another release
cycle or two past where we're using it ourselves.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-10-06 17:39:18 | Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-10-06 17:29:02 | Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters |