Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters

From: David E(dot) Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Royce Ausburn <royce(dot)ml(at)inomial(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters
Date: 2011-10-06 17:29:02
Message-ID: D90F69A8-63E4-49C2-BFB2-F07FC958CCD5@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Oct 6, 2011, at 9:46 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> +1. However, if that's the route we're traveling down, I think we had
>> better go ahead and remove the one remaining => operator from hstore
>> in 9.2:
>
> Fair enough.

Would it then be added as an alias for := for named function parameters? Or would that come still later?

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-10-06 17:37:01 Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-10-06 17:26:56 Re: checkpoints are duplicated even while the system is idle