Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Royce Ausburn <royce(dot)ml(at)inomial(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters
Date: 2011-10-06 17:39:18
Message-ID: 3959A6DC-A229-4FCD-89AA-6C8C61AA1294@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Oct 6, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> Would it then be added as an alias for := for named function parameters? Or would that come still later?
>
> Once we do that, it will be impossible not merely deprecated to use =>
> as an operator name. I think that has to wait at least another release
> cycle or two past where we're using it ourselves.

Okay. I kind of like := so there's no rush AFAIC. :-)

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-10-06 17:46:54 Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-10-06 17:37:01 Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters