Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"

From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Steve Crawford" <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
Date: 2008-12-01 20:05:48
Message-ID: 2f4958ff0812011205x5105590cr76a6ec54cfaf4913@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Steve Crawford <
scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> wrote:

>
> http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2008/11/oops-we-did-it-again-mysql-51-released.html
>
> All interesting, but especially the part about half-way down under the
> heading "So what went wrong with MySQL 5.1 ?" - must-read for anyone
> involved in selecting a database.
>

well, at least they have replication and partitioning built in. How reliable
it is, is completely another story - but still, they are a step ahead in
that regard.
Now I know why Tom Lane doesn't have a blog :)

--
GJ

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2008-12-01 20:16:10 Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"
Previous Message Steve Crawford 2008-12-01 20:00:03 Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again"