From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" |
Date: | 2008-12-01 20:26:39 |
Message-ID: | 1228163199.6675.65.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 20:05 +0000, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Steve Crawford
> <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> wrote:
> http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2008/11/oops-we-did-it-again-mysql-51-released.html
>
> All interesting, but especially the part about half-way down
> under the heading "So what went wrong with MySQL 5.1 ?" -
> must-read for anyone involved in selecting a database.
>
>
> well, at least they have replication and partitioning built in. How
> reliable it is, is completely another story - but still, they are a
> step ahead in that regard.
Depends on your needs, a broken step is worse than a manual one.
Joshua D. Drake
> Now I know why Tom Lane doesn't have a blog :)
>
> --
> GJ
--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-12-01 20:31:26 | Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-12-01 20:16:10 | Re: Monty on MySQL 5.1: "Oops, we did it again" |