| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
| Date: | 2014-02-04 18:53:36 |
| Message-ID: | 27340.1391540016@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On 02/04/2014 09:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> My own opinion is that I've already wasted untold man-hours thanks to
>> the random porting problems induced by Windows, a platform that I never
>> have and never will care about personally. I will *not* spend my own
>> time doing tests that someone else could do. If we can't get some
>> effort contributed by someone who does use that platform, I'm personally
>> prepared to declare the entire damn thing no longer supported.
> Although that is obviously your prerogative it is important to remember
> that Windows is easily the second most used version of PostgreSQL out
> there (behind Linux).
[ shrug... ] If it's so widely used, why is it so hard to find somebody
who's willing to put in some development effort for it?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-02-04 19:09:57 | Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation |
| Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2014-02-04 18:51:53 | Re: nested hstore - large insert crashes server |