From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
Date: | 2014-02-04 19:18:14 |
Message-ID: | 52F13CF6.4000403@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/04/2014 10:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> On 02/04/2014 09:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> My own opinion is that I've already wasted untold man-hours thanks to
>>> the random porting problems induced by Windows, a platform that I never
>>> have and never will care about personally. I will *not* spend my own
>>> time doing tests that someone else could do. If we can't get some
>>> effort contributed by someone who does use that platform, I'm personally
>>> prepared to declare the entire damn thing no longer supported.
>
>> Although that is obviously your prerogative it is important to remember
>> that Windows is easily the second most used version of PostgreSQL out
>> there (behind Linux).
>
> [ shrug... ] If it's so widely used, why is it so hard to find somebody
> who's willing to put in some development effort for it?
Well, from what I have seen of the Windows world there is a fairly sharp
demarcation between users and developers. So use does not necessarily
mean developer knowledge.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-02-04 19:37:38 | Re: PQputCopyData dont signal error |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2014-02-04 19:17:06 | Re: nested hstore - large insert crashes server |