Re: nested hstore - large insert crashes server

From: "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: "Christian Kruse" <christian(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru, obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net
Subject: Re: nested hstore - large insert crashes server
Date: 2014-02-04 18:51:53
Message-ID: 1ce2630f452781b17a9fc565adc65af8.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, February 4, 2014 18:56, Christian Kruse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/02/14 17:41, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>
>> 2014-02-04 10:34:25.376 CET 29133 LOG: server process (PID 29459) was terminated by signal 9: Killed
>
> Did you check if this was the OOM killer? Should be logged in dmesg.
>

I would be surprised if it wasn't. (no access to that machine at the moment)

How do we regard such crashes? It seems to me this was rather eaasily 'provoked' (for want of a better word).

I am inclined to blame the patch...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-02-04 18:53:36 Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-02-04 18:28:38 Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation