Re: new psql \d command

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new psql \d command
Date: 2003-08-07 16:22:30
Message-ID: 21457.1060273350@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> It just seemed complex to figure out which operators needed parens and
> which didn't.

The fact that the first attempt was wrong doesn't improve my faith in
that code one bit ;-). I don't want pg_dump invoking it, even as an
option. Someone will get burnt.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-07 16:29:57 Re: new psql \d command
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-07 16:08:19 Re: new psql \d command