| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new psql \d command |
| Date: | 2003-08-07 16:29:57 |
| Message-ID: | 200308071629.h77GTvZ14328@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > It just seemed complex to figure out which operators needed parens and
> > which didn't.
>
> The fact that the first attempt was wrong doesn't improve my faith in
> that code one bit ;-). I don't want pg_dump invoking it, even as an
> option. Someone will get burnt.
Yes, even if we get it right now, it might break in the future by a
change somewhere else, and we may not discover the breakage until it is
too late.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-08-07 16:31:19 | Re: new psql \d command |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-07 16:22:30 | Re: new psql \d command |