Re: new psql \d command

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new psql \d command
Date: 2003-08-07 16:41:21
Message-ID: 3F328131.60508@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


An alternative might be something that postprocesses the output from
pg_dump into, say, XML. I've been thinking about that. I might put it
on my todo list.

andrew

Tom Lane wrote:

>Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>
>>It just seemed complex to figure out which operators needed parens and
>>which didn't.
>>
>>
>
>The fact that the first attempt was wrong doesn't improve my faith in
>that code one bit ;-). I don't want pg_dump invoking it, even as an
>option. Someone will get burnt.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2003-08-07 16:51:11 Re: "truncate all"?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-08-07 16:40:02 test