Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README

From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README
Date: 2014-07-03 03:14:37
Message-ID: 20140703031437.GE10574@toroid.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 2014-07-03 11:59:21 +0900, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>
> +1. Even if it is just a doc patch, it has been submitted after 6/15,
> which was the CF1 deadline.

Well, to be fair, the original patch was posted to the list more than a
month ago, and it should have been in this CF. But… it wasn't. And now
after more than two weeks into this CF, I don't think it should be.

I moved it to 2014-08. (Sorry, Peter.)

-- Abhijit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-07-03 03:33:29 Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-07-03 02:59:21 Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README