Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README
Date: 2014-07-03 02:59:21
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRe9NoKty0tJDbmGMqwdeyTHHcg-9M05MHtMBLzz-SkXw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> At 2014-07-02 17:24:06 -0700, pg(at)heroku(dot)com wrote:
>>
>> I've added this to the ongoing commitfest.
>
> I don't actually understand why you were able to do that (seeing as this
> CF is no longer open for new patches). Trivial or not, I think at this
> point it should go into the next one. Or it should be handled outside
> the CF altogether.
+1. Even if it is just a doc patch, it has been submitted after 6/15,
which was the CF1 deadline.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2014-07-03 03:14:37 Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README
Previous Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2014-07-03 02:40:31 Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README