| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README |
| Date: | 2014-07-03 03:33:29 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZTPF7YhaY-itjKPyJ5rR6E-dZ4bC6=-wrMD-h4GUhDMug@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Well, to be fair, the original patch was posted to the list more than a
> month ago, and it should have been in this CF. But… it wasn't. And now
> after more than two weeks into this CF, I don't think it should be.
Is that how the rule is interpreted? Okay, I defer to you. I guess
I've just never seen a situation where that distinction needed to be
drawn come up before.
> I moved it to 2014-08. (Sorry, Peter.)
I don't mind if no one looks at this until then. I agree that this is
exactly the kind of thing that generally doesn't need to be handled
through a commitfest submission. The only reason I added this to any
commitfest was to avoid having it be forgotten about entirely, which
there is a real danger of for something like this when it isn't
handled quickly. I almost forgot about it myself.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-07-03 03:44:18 | Re: Proposing pg_hibernate |
| Previous Message | Abhijit Menon-Sen | 2014-07-03 03:14:37 | Re: Stating the significance of Lehman & Yao in the nbtree README |