| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: mismatching proargtypes/proallargtypes (bug #10122) |
| Date: | 2014-04-24 01:06:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20140424010600.GU25695@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > 'trinque' on irc reported that "SELECT pg_catalog.pg_identify_object(oid,
> > integer, integer)'::regprocedure" doesn't work and Andrew Gierth noticed
> > it's because proargtypes doesn't match proallargtypes.
>
> Ugh, how annoying.
Argh!
> What I'm inclined to do in the back branches is just correct the
> catalogs without bumping catversion (since we can't do that).
> At least installations initdb'd in future will have it right.
Maybe we can provide an UPDATE to fix it in existing installations, for
those interested in doing so.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-04-24 01:26:47 | Re: mismatching proargtypes/proallargtypes (bug #10122) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-04-24 00:37:33 | Re: mismatching proargtypes/proallargtypes (bug #10122) |