Re: mismatching proargtypes/proallargtypes (bug #10122)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: mismatching proargtypes/proallargtypes (bug #10122)
Date: 2014-04-24 01:26:47
Message-ID: 15349.1398302807@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> 'trinque' on irc reported that "SELECT pg_catalog.pg_identify_object(oid,
>>> integer, integer)'::regprocedure" doesn't work and Andrew Gierth noticed
>>> it's because proargtypes doesn't match proallargtypes.

>> Ugh, how annoying.

> Argh!

On reflection it's not quite as bad as it seems: the correct signature of
the function is pg_identify_object(oid,oid,integer) and the regprocedure
code does accept that. AFAICT the only readily visible effect of the bug
is that psql's \df lies about what the input argument datatypes are.

> Maybe we can provide an UPDATE to fix it in existing installations, for
> those interested in doing so.

Doubt it's worth the trouble really ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-04-24 01:30:39 Re: BUG #10122: proargtypes and proallargtypes are inconsistent for pg_identify_object
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-04-24 01:06:00 Re: mismatching proargtypes/proallargtypes (bug #10122)